首页> 外文OA文献 >Experiences of high-risk pregnant women who were offered a choice between non-invasive prenatal testing, invasive testing or no follow-up test
【2h】

Experiences of high-risk pregnant women who were offered a choice between non-invasive prenatal testing, invasive testing or no follow-up test

机译:高危孕妇的经历,可以在无创产前检查,有创检查或无后续检查之间进行选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The TRIDENT study (Trial by Dutch laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing) evaluates the implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Dutch healthcare system. Here we report on the preferences and experiences of pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy who were offered a choice between NIPT, invasive testing or no follow-up test. METHODS: A nationwide prospective cohort study among pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy because of first trimester screening results (risk ≥1:200) or medical history. Questionnaires were administered to the women, to be completed after counselling and after receiving the test-results, at seven (of the eight) prenatal diagnostic centers in the Netherlands. The questionnaires addressed: women's preference for follow-up testing, intention to terminate the pregnancy, attitudes, knowledge, decisional conflict, anxiety and satisfaction. RESULTS: Pre- and post-test questionnaires were completed by n = 1,106 (86% response) and n = 686 (67% response) women, respectively. Preliminary analyses show that the majority of respondents (92%) preferred NIPT, 5% invasive testing, 2% were unsure, and 1% declined testing. The main reason to prefer NIPT was safety for the child (92%). Of the 60 women preferring invasive testing, 52% did so because of test-accuracy, 25% desired more rapid test-results, 5% because it provides more information, and 18% reported other reasons. Most women (92%) felt that they made a well-informed decision, and 75% reported that this decision was easy to make. Intention to terminate the pregnancy for Down syndrome was lower among women preferring NIPT (58%) compared to women preferring invasive testing (87%). Women were highly satisfied with NIPT. However, 64% perceived the waiting time for NIPT results (mean: 11 days (range 5-32)) as too long, while 3% in retrospect would have preferred a different follow-up test, mostly to avoid the long waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnant women in our study felt they could make an informed decision. The majority of women prefer NIPT, mainly because it has no miscarriage risk. Reducing turnaround time for test-results is our next challenge in meeting women's needs.
机译:目标:TRIDENT研究(荷兰实验室评估无创产前检查的试验)评估了荷兰医疗保健系统中无创产前检查(NIPT)的实施情况。在这里,我们报告高风险胎儿非整倍体孕妇的喜好和经历,这些孕妇可以在NIPT,有创检查或不进行随访检查之间进行选择。方法:一项全国前瞻性队列研究在因早孕筛查结果(风险≥1:200)或病史而有胎儿非整倍性高风险的孕妇中进行。在荷兰的八个(八个)产前诊断中心中,对妇女进行了问卷调查,在咨询后和接受测试结果后完成。问卷涉及:妇女对后续检查的偏爱,终止妊娠的意愿,态度,知识,决定性冲突,焦虑和满意度。结果:分别由n = 1,106(占86%)和n = 686(占67%)的女性完成了测试前和测试后的问卷。初步分析显示,大多数受访者(92%)倾向于NIPT,5%的侵入性测试,2%的不确定性,1%的拒绝测试。偏爱NIPT的主要原因是儿童的安全(92%)。在60名更喜欢侵入性测试的女性中,有52%的人是出于测试准确性的原因,有25%的人希望获得更快的测试结果,有5%的人希望提供更多的信息,还有18%的人报告了其他原因。大多数女性(92%)认为她们做出了明智的决定,而75%的女性表示此决定容易做出。唐氏综合症终止妊娠的意愿与偏爱侵入性检查的女性(87%)相比,偏爱NIPT的女性(58%)更低。妇女对NIPT非常满意。但是,有64%的人认为NIPT结果的等待时间(平均:11天(范围5-32))太长,而回想起来,有3%的人宁愿选择其他后续测试,主要是为了避免等待时间长。结论:我们研究中的大多数孕妇认为她们可以做出明智的决定。大多数妇女喜欢NIPT,主要是因为它没有流产的风险。减少测试结果的周转时间是满足女性需求的下一个挑战。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号